3-D Printing: New Tech Hits the Construction Industry

Builders, engineers and architects across the globe are embracing 3-D printing technology as a new way to design and construct buildings. With reduced labor and material costs, and the ability to construct buildings in a matter of days, rather than months or years, it’s a clear why construction professionals are looking to utilize the new technology – but could 3-D printing be too good to be true for the mainstream construction industry?

While 3-D printing or additive manufacturing has just begun to take off over the past three to four years, the process has existed for over three decades. Several different 3-D printing processes have been invented since the late 1970s, but the printers were originally large, expensive, and highly limited in what they could produce – a far cry from today’s 3-D printing capabilities.

Technology professionals and innovative building companies have worked together to create designs and custom printers, which have been used to build structures such as residential model homes and other buildings. The creation of a 3-D-printed object is achieved by laying down layer upon layers of material until the entire object is formed, producing a tangible replica of the digital model.  

Case studies

3-D printing of homes and buildings is not ready to go commercial yet, but the technology has been developed to the point where full-sized testing has been accomplished. In fact, Chinese company WinSun Decoration Design Engineering Co. (WinSun) first showcased its innovative skills and the capabilities of 3-D printing in 2014 – constructing 10 houses in less than 24 hours, each costing just $5,000. Although the houses aren’t initially equipped with plumbing, electrical wiring or insulation, they are designed to accommodate the addition of these systems after construction.

Most recently, WinSun used the same technology in 2015 to construct two buildings that represent new frontiers for 3-D printed construction: a five-story apartment block and a 1,100 square meter mansion complete with internal and external decoration.

WinSun's 3D-printed building in Suzhou industrial park. Photograph: Imaginechina/Corbis

The WinSun buildings were created using a custom-made giant printer, measuring 6.6 meters wide by 10 meters tall that took the company 12 years to develop. Printing horizontal layers of “ink” – a mixture of glass fiber, steel, cement, hardening agents and recycled construction waste – the machine creates several large building sections that are then assembled together to create the final structure, much like other prefabricated materials are used to create smaller scale projects within a building.

A villa built by 3D printing technology is seen in the Suzhou industrial park. – PHOTOS: XINHUA

Other companies, institutions and designers around the globe are planning to use 3-D printing to push the limits of the new technology and oust traditional construction methods, including researchers at MIT who are looking to print a pavilion by imitating the way a silkworm builds its cocoon. UK architects Softkill Design are working to create a single-story dwelling with a fibrous structure resembling bone growth and DUS Architects in Amsterdam announced a project to print, room by room, a canal house in the city using a homemade portable printer located inside an upended shipping container.

Impact on Construction and Housing Markets

Despite the many ways 3-D printing could enhance architectural design and capabilities, as well as reduce costs for construction companies, homeowners and businesses, there are a few possible pitfalls:

  1. Job Loss: Because 3-D printing requires fewer hands on deck, it has the potential to put a lot of construction workers out of business. Jobs that once required skilled laborers, such drywall installation, bricklaying or other highly trained craftsmen, are essentially replaced by a printer.
  2. Material Quality: Utilizing new materials without insights into long-term health could put us in a similar situation to that of asbestos – a once common building material that was later found to pose serious safety hazards.
  3. Material Diversity: Traditional buildings are made from different materials: concrete, drywall, steel beams, etc. However, with 3-D printing, materials used per project might be limited due to a printers’ inability to produce designs with multiple materials.  
  4. Transportation and Storage: The larger the project, the larger the printer and volume of materials needed, which could make transportation and on-site storage an issue.
  5. High Risk of Error: While human error is always a possibility on traditional job sites, when it comes to 3-D printing, any errors in the digital model can result in problematic issues on-site during the printing and construction phase. If the problem isn’t caught in time, materials could be lost and undermine the initial cost savings.
  6. Trickle-Down Effect: With their products no longer required for building, not only will the construction industry see job loss, but conventional product manufacturing companies and equipment rental companies could suffer as well.

Whether the future use of 3-D printing will be to create new aesthetic structures or to provide low-cost housing, it is clear that the technology will change the construction industry forever. In spite of the concerns, 3-D printing’s use in construction shows no signs of slowing down. If companies continue to innovate and test the technology, we may someday live in printed homes and work in printed skyscrapers. 


The process was simple: we were provided questions that the writers wanted to discuss, we were interviewed, and then we got to see a few drafts before the final version went to print. Given the quality of this publication, on behalf of Giroux, I can assure everyone that all of my partners would be happy to participate in similar articles in the future.
— Barbara Kotsos, Director of Marketing & PR, Giroux Glass
Kyle and his team were very professional and patient in explaining their program to us. Their communications were clear and concise and did a great job of guiding us through the process of getting published in their magazine.
— Michael Henthorn, Owner, Henthorn Commercial Construction
Thank you all your efforts in putting together such a great article about our company in US Builders Review. DH Construction appreciates the professional manner in which your team worked with us to achieve the stateside exposure we were after; especially taking the time to get all of the facts correct. In short, the article was extremely well put together and we have already received a great deal of feedback, interest, and compliments as a result of the piece. Once again, we appreciate all the effort, and without a doubt, we will not hesitate to work with your organization again in the future.
— Daniel Harrigan, Principal, DH Construction
The staff was very helpful and easy to work with while developing our story. They were always open to our ideas and provided us useful information to maximize our visibility using social media. We were certainly pleased with final article.
— Daryl Whitmer, Marketing Program Manager, Harrison French & Associates (HFA)
I was contacted as a nominee for the Greenbuild Editor’s Choice 2016 recognition and I couldn’t have asked for a better experience. Working with US Builders Review has been a blessing for my company. Erica Berry took an awesome interview in the initial call as she gathered data for the article. She was concerned about how we became us, and she made me feel important by listening and taking notes. Then there is Ian Nichols who made me feel so comfortable in sharing my story, and Molly Shaw who interviewed me as well, as she was getting ready to create an awesome article about my company -- and I must say she nailed it on the first run! What a pleasure it has been to work with everyone. This feature on Container Homes USA will help me push the company into the forefront at the Greenbuild Expo 2016.
— Derrick C. W. Childs, Director Construction & Design, Container Homes USA
Ryan at TrueLine was a pleasure to work with and we wouldn't hesitate to recommend him or TrueLine to anyone in the future. They were professional, organized and great to work with through the process!
— James Cahill, President and Partner, J. Calnan & Associates
I would like to commend the US Builders Review staff for their work in developing and writing a fantastic article for Miller Contracting Group, Inc. It was truly a pleasure to work with their professional and well organized staff.
— Chuck Daniels, Business Manager, Miller Contracting Group Inc.
Professional with attention to customer’s needs. Well prepared vision for article while open to suggestions. Provided plenty feedback and review prior to final draft. Thanks in advance for the assistance and promotion of our organization!
— Jason Lee, LEED AP O+M, Director of Sustainability and Optimization for Harvard Maintenance
It was an absolute pleasure to work with the writers and editorial team at TrueLine Publishing for our recent article in US Builders Review. From the start of the project, it was apparent that everyone involved was very concerned with accuracy and getting the facts right. They were also very conscientious about soliciting our feedback and ensuring that we were happy with the content and with the manner in which Giroux Glass was described in the finalized piece.
— Barbara Kotsos, Director of Marketing & PR, Giroux Glass
We are excited to be featured as a case study in US Builders Review and look forward to sharing our company’s story with a national audience.
— Ryan Sanzari, Director of Operations, Alfred Sanzari Enterprises


Spring 2018



  • * We’ll never share your email or info with anyone.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.