2026 Construction Salary Benchmarks: What Builders Should Budget to Hire Top Talent
- by: Erica Berry
- in Construction
Construction pay in 2026 has less to do with job title than it does with zip code. A Superintendent overseeing a mid-rise project in Indianapolis and one running a similar job in Boston can be separated by more than $60,000 a year—same scope, same responsibilities, wildly different budget lines. For builders planning headcount for the year ahead, that spread is the difference between a competitive offer and a candidate who walks.
This guide breaks down 2026 salary data across ten in-demand construction roles and 25 major U.S. markets, so builders, developers, and construction executives can benchmark pay with real numbers instead of guesswork. We’ve also included average time-to-fill for each role, because a role that sits open for three extra weeks has its own hidden cost, one that a slightly higher salary often prevents.
Why Location Still Drives Construction Pay in 2026
Three forces are doing most of the work behind these market gaps. Coastal and gateway metros—Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle—carry both a higher cost of living and a denser pipeline of competing projects, which pushes base pay up across every role on this list. Sun Belt and secondary metros—Indianapolis, Columbus, San Antonio, Salt Lake City—offer builders a lower cost base, but that advantage only holds as long as the local labor pool keeps up with demand; several of these markets show some of the longest time-to-fill numbers in the data despite lower pay, a sign that the discount isn’t free. And specialization commands its own premium everywhere: HVAC and electrical expertise, multifamily experience, and commercial project scale all add meaningfully to base pay regardless of city.
About This Data
The figures below reflect actual 2026 placement data across ten construction roles and 25 U.S. metro markets, covering base salary and average time-to-fill in days. Where a market had more than one placement for a role, we’ve averaged the salaries to give a representative figure. Builders should treat these as directional benchmarks for budgeting. Actual offers will still flex with project complexity, candidate experience, and how tight the local labor pool is at the time of the search.
Foreman Pay by Market
Foreman pay is the most compressed band in this data, a reminder that even at the most competitive markets, this role rarely breaks into six figures by much.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| New York, NY | $124,500 |
| Los Angeles, CA | $118,500 |
| Minneapolis, MN | $105,500 |
| Atlanta, GA | $103,500 |
| Nashville, TN | $100,000 |
| Dallas, TX | $99,750 |
| Austin, TX | $97,500 |
| Raleigh, NC | $95,500 |
| Columbus, OH | $93,000 |
| Indianapolis, IN | $90,000 |
| Richmond, VA | $90,000 |
| Orlando, FL | $90,000 |
| San Antonio, TX | $90,000 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $90,000 |
Range: $90,000 (multiple markets) to $124,500 (New York, NY), with $90,000 acting as a clear price floor across six separate markets.
Superintendent Pay by Market
Superintendent is the widest-ranging field role in the dataset, with a nearly $63,000 spread between the lowest and highest markets.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Boston, MA | $155,000 |
| New York, NY | $154,000 |
| Seattle, WA | $145,500 |
| Los Angeles, CA | $140,250 |
| Austin, TX | $130,000 |
| Dallas, TX | $116,500 |
| Nashville, TN | $115,000 |
| Charlotte, NC | $113,000 |
| Minneapolis, MN | $112,500 |
| Atlanta, GA | $112,000 |
| Denver, CO | $111,000 |
| Tampa, FL | $108,500 |
| Houston, TX | $107,750 |
| Raleigh, NC | $107,500 |
| San Antonio, TX | $107,000 |
| Jacksonville, FL | $102,000 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | $101,000 |
| Richmond, VA | $100,500 |
| Indianapolis, IN | $95,500 |
| Columbus, OH | $94,000 |
Range: ~$92,500–$98,500 in Indianapolis to $155,000 in Boston. Builders staffing this role in gateway metros should budget close to $150K; in the Midwest and interior Sun Belt, competitive offers still land in the mid-$90Ks to low $100Ks.
Specialty Superintendent Roles
Multifamily and electrical superintendents command a distinct premium tied to their specialization, not just their market.
Multifamily Superintendent:
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Seattle, WA | $135,000 |
| Dallas, TX | $119,500 |
| Phoenix, AZ | $108,000 |
| Raleigh, NC | $101,500 |
| Jacksonville, FL | $97,000 |
| Columbus, OH | $94,750 |
| Kansas City, MO | $90,000 |
Electrical Superintendent: Boston, MA led at $140,500, versus $98,500 in Kansas City, MO, a $42,000 gap on a limited but telling sample.
Estimator Pay by Market
Estimator pay stays relatively tight through most markets before spiking in the two most expensive metros.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| New York, NY | $128,500 |
| Boston, MA | $127,500 |
| Seattle, WA | $108,000 |
| Nashville, TN | $101,250 |
| Houston, TX | $100,000 |
| Phoenix, AZ | $99,250 |
| Charlotte, NC | $98,500 |
| Miami, FL | $95,500 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | $94,000 |
| Orlando, FL | $94,000 |
| San Antonio, TX | $90,000 |
| Jacksonville, FL | $90,000 |
| Richmond, VA | $90,000 |
Range: $90,000 (several markets) to $128,500 (New York, NY). Notably, Estimator pay in Boston and New York runs close to Project Manager pay in mid-tier markets, a useful data point for builders trying to decide where estimating talent fits in the budget.
HVAC Estimator Pay by Market
HVAC estimating carries a clear premium over general estimating in nearly every overlapping market.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Seattle, WA | $142,500 |
| Denver, CO | $133,000 |
| Minneapolis, MN | $124,500 |
| Miami, FL | $120,000 |
| Tampa, FL | $106,500 |
| Columbus, OH | $104,500 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $101,500 |
| Orlando, FL | $98,500 |
Range: $98,500 (Orlando, FL) to $142,500 (Seattle, WA).
Project Manager Pay by Market
Project Manager pay shows one of the more consistent middle bands in the dataset, with most markets clustering between $100K and $130K.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Seattle, WA | $141,500 |
| Boston, MA | $138,000 |
| Denver, CO | $129,250 |
| Austin, TX | $124,750 |
| Tampa, FL | $119,000 |
| Phoenix, AZ | $115,750 |
| Dallas, TX | $115,500 |
| Atlanta, GA | $113,500 |
| Kansas City, MO | $113,500 |
| Charlotte, NC | $113,000 |
| Orlando, FL | $113,000 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $110,000 |
| Jacksonville, FL | $102,500 |
| Richmond, VA | $99,500 |
| San Antonio, TX | $95,500 |
Range: $95,500 (San Antonio, TX) to $141,500 (Seattle, WA).
Commercial Project Manager Pay by Market
Commercial-scope PM work commands a premium over general Project Manager pay in nearly every comparable market worth flagging separately for builders scoping large commercial work.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| New York, NY | $170,000 |
| Los Angeles, CA | $168,500 |
| Charlotte, NC | $136,000 |
| Minneapolis, MN | $135,500 |
| Richmond, VA | $117,500 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $115,500 |
Range: $115,500 (Las Vegas, NV) to $170,000 (New York, NY).
Director of Construction Pay by Market
At the Director level, pay compresses less by geography and more by the scale of the portfolio a candidate is expected to run.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Miami, FL | $148,500 |
| Denver, CO | $137,500 |
| Atlanta, GA | $128,750 |
| Raleigh, NC | $128,500 |
| Indianapolis, IN | $128,000 |
| Tampa, FL | $126,500 |
| Las Vegas, NV | $121,000 |
| Nashville, TN | $120,500 |
Range: $120,500 (Nashville, TN) to $148,500 (Miami, FL). Unlike the field roles above, Director pay in secondary markets like Indianapolis and Raleigh lands within striking distance of larger metros, a sign that this role is priced more on scope than location.
VP of Construction Pay by Market
VP-level pay is where the market spread becomes dramatic, ranging from the high $160Ks to well into the high $200Ks.
| Market | Salary |
|---|---|
| Boston, MA | $283,500 |
| Miami, FL | $240,000 |
| Houston, TX | $216,500 |
| Tampa, FL | $188,000 |
| Orlando, FL | $177,000 |
| Kansas City, MO | $167,000 |
Range: $167,000 (Kansas City, MO) to $283,500 (Boston, MA), a spread of over $116,000. Builders recruiting for this seat in a top-tier metro should expect compensation conversations to start well north of $200K.
Time-to-Fill: The Hidden Cost of Underpricing a Role
Salary isn’t the only number that matters when budgeting a hire. How long a role sits open carries a real cost in delayed schedules and overworked teams. Across all 122 placements in this dataset, the average time-to-fill was 8.7 days, ranging from as fast as 5 days to as long as 28.
Average time-to-fill by role, slowest to fastest:
| Role | Avg. Days to Fill |
|---|---|
| Director of Construction | 11.1 |
| VP of Construction | 10.8 |
| Project Manager | 10.1 |
| Commercial PM | 9.3 |
| Estimator | 8.6 |
| HVAC Estimator | 8.1 |
| Multifamily Superintendent | 8.0 |
| Foreman | 7.8 |
| Superintendent | 7.7 |
| Electrical Superintendent | 7.0 |
Leadership roles take longest to fill on average, which tracks. There are simply fewer qualified candidates at that level. But some of the longest individual searches in the data appeared in markets and roles where pay lagged the broader trend: a VP of Construction search in Kansas City took 28 days, a Director of Construction search in Tampa took 24, and both a Foreman role in Atlanta and an Estimator role in Charlotte took 22. In each case, the salary offered sat at or near the low end for that role, a pattern worth watching when a search is dragging.
What This Means for Your 2026 Hiring Budget
The clearest takeaway for builders planning 2026 headcount is that a single national salary line doesn’t work anymore, if it ever did. A Superintendent budget built around Indianapolis numbers will fail in Boston or New York before the first interview. A Director of Construction search, on the other hand, can be budgeted more consistently across markets since scope, not city, drives most of the variation.
Builders should also weigh the time-to-fill data alongside salary when setting an offer range. The markets and roles with the longest average search times in this dataset weren’t necessarily the highest-paying ones. Several were cases where the offer sat below the local market rate. Pricing a role a few thousand dollars above the low end of its market range is often cheaper, in the end, than the cost of a project running short-staffed for an extra three weeks.






