Blog

2026 Construction Salary Benchmarks: What Builders Should Budget to Hire Top Talent

Real salary data across 25 markets and 10 roles, plus time-to-fill benchmarks, so builders can budget for the right hire in the right city.

Construction pay in 2026 has less to do with job title than it does with zip code. A Superintendent overseeing a mid-rise project in Indianapolis and one running a similar job in Boston can be separated by more than $60,000 a year—same scope, same responsibilities, wildly different budget lines. For builders planning headcount for the year ahead, that spread is the difference between a competitive offer and a candidate who walks.

This guide breaks down 2026 salary data across ten in-demand construction roles and 25 major U.S. markets, so builders, developers, and construction executives can benchmark pay with real numbers instead of guesswork. We’ve also included average time-to-fill for each role, because a role that sits open for three extra weeks has its own hidden cost, one that a slightly higher salary often prevents.

Why Location Still Drives Construction Pay in 2026

Three forces are doing most of the work behind these market gaps. Coastal and gateway metros—Boston, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle—carry both a higher cost of living and a denser pipeline of competing projects, which pushes base pay up across every role on this list. Sun Belt and secondary metros—Indianapolis, Columbus, San Antonio, Salt Lake City—offer builders a lower cost base, but that advantage only holds as long as the local labor pool keeps up with demand; several of these markets show some of the longest time-to-fill numbers in the data despite lower pay, a sign that the discount isn’t free. And specialization commands its own premium everywhere: HVAC and electrical expertise, multifamily experience, and commercial project scale all add meaningfully to base pay regardless of city.

About This Data

The figures below reflect actual 2026 placement data across ten construction roles and 25 U.S. metro markets, covering base salary and average time-to-fill in days. Where a market had more than one placement for a role, we’ve averaged the salaries to give a representative figure. Builders should treat these as directional benchmarks for budgeting. Actual offers will still flex with project complexity, candidate experience, and how tight the local labor pool is at the time of the search.

Foreman Pay by Market

Foreman pay is the most compressed band in this data, a reminder that even at the most competitive markets, this role rarely breaks into six figures by much.

Market Salary
New York, NY $124,500
Los Angeles, CA $118,500
Minneapolis, MN $105,500
Atlanta, GA $103,500
Nashville, TN $100,000
Dallas, TX $99,750
Austin, TX $97,500
Raleigh, NC $95,500
Columbus, OH $93,000
Indianapolis, IN $90,000
Richmond, VA $90,000
Orlando, FL $90,000
San Antonio, TX $90,000
Las Vegas, NV $90,000

Range: $90,000 (multiple markets) to $124,500 (New York, NY), with $90,000 acting as a clear price floor across six separate markets.

Superintendent Pay by Market

Superintendent is the widest-ranging field role in the dataset, with a nearly $63,000 spread between the lowest and highest markets.

Market Salary
Boston, MA $155,000
New York, NY $154,000
Seattle, WA $145,500
Los Angeles, CA $140,250
Austin, TX $130,000
Dallas, TX $116,500
Nashville, TN $115,000
Charlotte, NC $113,000
Minneapolis, MN $112,500
Atlanta, GA $112,000
Denver, CO $111,000
Tampa, FL $108,500
Houston, TX $107,750
Raleigh, NC $107,500
San Antonio, TX $107,000
Jacksonville, FL $102,000
Salt Lake City, UT $101,000
Richmond, VA $100,500
Indianapolis, IN $95,500
Columbus, OH $94,000

Range: ~$92,500–$98,500 in Indianapolis to $155,000 in Boston. Builders staffing this role in gateway metros should budget close to $150K; in the Midwest and interior Sun Belt, competitive offers still land in the mid-$90Ks to low $100Ks.

Specialty Superintendent Roles

Multifamily and electrical superintendents command a distinct premium tied to their specialization, not just their market.

Multifamily Superintendent:

Market Salary
Seattle, WA $135,000
Dallas, TX $119,500
Phoenix, AZ $108,000
Raleigh, NC $101,500
Jacksonville, FL $97,000
Columbus, OH $94,750
Kansas City, MO $90,000

Electrical Superintendent: Boston, MA led at $140,500, versus $98,500 in Kansas City, MO, a $42,000 gap on a limited but telling sample.

Estimator Pay by Market

Estimator pay stays relatively tight through most markets before spiking in the two most expensive metros.

Market Salary
New York, NY $128,500
Boston, MA $127,500
Seattle, WA $108,000
Nashville, TN $101,250
Houston, TX $100,000
Phoenix, AZ $99,250
Charlotte, NC $98,500
Miami, FL $95,500
Salt Lake City, UT $94,000
Orlando, FL $94,000
San Antonio, TX $90,000
Jacksonville, FL $90,000
Richmond, VA $90,000

Range: $90,000 (several markets) to $128,500 (New York, NY). Notably, Estimator pay in Boston and New York runs close to Project Manager pay in mid-tier markets, a useful data point for builders trying to decide where estimating talent fits in the budget.

HVAC Estimator Pay by Market

HVAC estimating carries a clear premium over general estimating in nearly every overlapping market.

Market Salary
Seattle, WA $142,500
Denver, CO $133,000
Minneapolis, MN $124,500
Miami, FL $120,000
Tampa, FL $106,500
Columbus, OH $104,500
Las Vegas, NV $101,500
Orlando, FL $98,500

Range: $98,500 (Orlando, FL) to $142,500 (Seattle, WA).

Project Manager Pay by Market

Project Manager pay shows one of the more consistent middle bands in the dataset, with most markets clustering between $100K and $130K.

Market Salary
Seattle, WA $141,500
Boston, MA $138,000
Denver, CO $129,250
Austin, TX $124,750
Tampa, FL $119,000
Phoenix, AZ $115,750
Dallas, TX $115,500
Atlanta, GA $113,500
Kansas City, MO $113,500
Charlotte, NC $113,000
Orlando, FL $113,000
Las Vegas, NV $110,000
Jacksonville, FL $102,500
Richmond, VA $99,500
San Antonio, TX $95,500

Range: $95,500 (San Antonio, TX) to $141,500 (Seattle, WA).

Commercial Project Manager Pay by Market

Commercial-scope PM work commands a premium over general Project Manager pay in nearly every comparable market worth flagging separately for builders scoping large commercial work.

Market Salary
New York, NY $170,000
Los Angeles, CA $168,500
Charlotte, NC $136,000
Minneapolis, MN $135,500
Richmond, VA $117,500
Las Vegas, NV $115,500

Range: $115,500 (Las Vegas, NV) to $170,000 (New York, NY).

Director of Construction Pay by Market

At the Director level, pay compresses less by geography and more by the scale of the portfolio a candidate is expected to run.

Market Salary
Miami, FL $148,500
Denver, CO $137,500
Atlanta, GA $128,750
Raleigh, NC $128,500
Indianapolis, IN $128,000
Tampa, FL $126,500
Las Vegas, NV $121,000
Nashville, TN $120,500

Range: $120,500 (Nashville, TN) to $148,500 (Miami, FL). Unlike the field roles above, Director pay in secondary markets like Indianapolis and Raleigh lands within striking distance of larger metros, a sign that this role is priced more on scope than location.

VP of Construction Pay by Market

VP-level pay is where the market spread becomes dramatic, ranging from the high $160Ks to well into the high $200Ks.

Market Salary
Boston, MA $283,500
Miami, FL $240,000
Houston, TX $216,500
Tampa, FL $188,000
Orlando, FL $177,000
Kansas City, MO $167,000

Range: $167,000 (Kansas City, MO) to $283,500 (Boston, MA), a spread of over $116,000. Builders recruiting for this seat in a top-tier metro should expect compensation conversations to start well north of $200K.

Time-to-Fill: The Hidden Cost of Underpricing a Role

Salary isn’t the only number that matters when budgeting a hire. How long a role sits open carries a real cost in delayed schedules and overworked teams. Across all 122 placements in this dataset, the average time-to-fill was 8.7 days, ranging from as fast as 5 days to as long as 28.

Average time-to-fill by role, slowest to fastest:

Role Avg. Days to Fill
Director of Construction 11.1
VP of Construction 10.8
Project Manager 10.1
Commercial PM 9.3
Estimator 8.6
HVAC Estimator 8.1
Multifamily Superintendent 8.0
Foreman 7.8
Superintendent 7.7
Electrical Superintendent 7.0

Leadership roles take longest to fill on average, which tracks. There are simply fewer qualified candidates at that level. But some of the longest individual searches in the data appeared in markets and roles where pay lagged the broader trend: a VP of Construction search in Kansas City took 28 days, a Director of Construction search in Tampa took 24, and both a Foreman role in Atlanta and an Estimator role in Charlotte took 22. In each case, the salary offered sat at or near the low end for that role, a pattern worth watching when a search is dragging.

What This Means for Your 2026 Hiring Budget

The clearest takeaway for builders planning 2026 headcount is that a single national salary line doesn’t work anymore, if it ever did. A Superintendent budget built around Indianapolis numbers will fail in Boston or New York before the first interview. A Director of Construction search, on the other hand, can be budgeted more consistently across markets since scope, not city, drives most of the variation.

Builders should also weigh the time-to-fill data alongside salary when setting an offer range. The markets and roles with the longest average search times in this dataset weren’t necessarily the highest-paying ones. Several were cases where the offer sat below the local market rate. Pricing a role a few thousand dollars above the low end of its market range is often cheaper, in the end, than the cost of a project running short-staffed for an extra three weeks.

Testimonials

It was an absolute pleasure to work with the writers and editorial team at TrueLine Publishing for our recent article in US Builders Review. From the start of the project, it was apparent that everyone involved was very concerned with accuracy and getting the facts right. They were also very conscientious about soliciting our feedback and ensuring that we were happy with the content and with the manner in which Giroux Glass was described in the finalized piece.
— Barbara Kotsos, Director of Marketing & PR, Giroux Glass
The process was simple: we were provided questions that the writers wanted to discuss, we were interviewed, and then we got to see a few drafts before the final version went to print. Given the quality of this publication, on behalf of Giroux, I can assure everyone that all of my partners would be happy to participate in similar articles in the future.
— Barbara Kotsos, Director of Marketing & PR, Giroux Glass
I was contacted by the company to write a review on my business. They handled the process very efficient and professional. The pictures came out great and the article was perfect. I am very happy with their work.
— Kirt McGhee, Owner, K4M Construction
I was contacted as a nominee for the Greenbuild Editor’s Choice 2016 recognition and I couldn’t have asked for a better experience. Working with US Builders Review has been a blessing for my company. Erica Berry took an awesome interview in the initial call as she gathered data for the article. She was concerned about how we became us, and she made me feel important by listening and taking notes. Then there is Ian Nichols who made me feel so comfortable in sharing my story, and Molly Shaw who interviewed me as well, as she was getting ready to create an awesome article about my company -- and I must say she nailed it on the first run! What a pleasure it has been to work with everyone. This feature on Container Homes USA will help me push the company into the forefront at the Greenbuild Expo 2016.
— Derrick C. W. Childs, Director Construction & Design, Container Homes USA
Kyle Gahm was instrumental in coordinating this project from beginning to end. He was always available and a pleasure to work with. It would be a pleasure to work with Kyle down the road. Bill Keaton was very impressive in raising money from advertising which resulted in ASE getting the cover story, so thank you Bill. Lia Prysunka and Jeanee Dudley are both very impressive individuals who deserve a lot of credit for this featured piece. They were both very patient and accepting of any changes we suggested. The format, quality, and resolution was awesome. To sum it all up: Our upper management, who never have been high on PR and things of this nature said that it was "absolutely fantastic" and were blown away. They now are requesting multiple copies of the full magazine and are very proud of the work you all put in. Thanks again.
— Ryan Sanzari, Director of Operations, Alfred Sanzari Enterprises
On behalf of Alfred Sanzari Enterprises, I would like to thank you for showcasing our company as a cover story in US Builders Review, and express our gratitude for a job well done in putting together an impressive editorial product. We already have received a great deal of positive feedback on the article and are confident it will be a very effective tool for sharing Alfred Sanzari Enterprises’ story, and our new hotel project, with a national audience of industry professionals. Please also extend our thanks to everyone on your team that helped in any way to produce this article. This was truly a collaborative effort.  Your staff listened to our feedback and was incredibly professional and accommodating to our requests throughout the entire process. We welcome the opportunity to collaborate with US Builders Review on future projects.
— Ryan Sanzari, Director of Operations, Alfred Sanzari Enterprises
I would like to commend the US Builders Review staff for their work in developing and writing a fantastic article for Miller Contracting Group, Inc. It was truly a pleasure to work with their professional and well organized staff.
— Chuck Daniels, Business Manager, Miller Contracting Group Inc.
I would like to commend the US Builders Review staff for their work in developing and writing a fantastic article for Miller Contracting Group, Inc. It was truly a pleasure to work with their professional and well organized staff.
— Chuck Daniels, Business Manager, Miller Contracting Group Inc.
Professional with attention to customer’s needs. Well prepared vision for article while open to suggestions. Provided plenty feedback and review prior to final draft. Thanks in advance for the assistance and promotion of our organization!
— Jason Lee, LEED AP O+M, Director of Sustainability and Optimization for Harvard Maintenance
The staff was very helpful and easy to work with while developing our story. They were always open to our ideas and provided us useful information to maximize our visibility using social media. We were certainly pleased with final article.
— Daryl Whitmer, Marketing Program Manager, Harrison French & Associates (HFA)

LATEST EDITION

Spring 2018

READ NOW

GET US BUILDERS REVIEW IN YOUR INBOX.

  • * We’ll never share your email or info with anyone.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.